Skip to main content
· 10/6/1975

Jimens v. United States

Citations

  • 423 U.S. 856
  • 96 S. Ct. 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, “[w]e see no meaningful difference between a security interest and an assignment for the purposes of security. In fact, they appear to be the same thing under Article 9.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.