· 6/18/2020
Jimenez Verastegui v. Nielsen
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Board’s determination of invalidity satisfied the statutory requirements and was based on due consideration of the facts
- Board's determination of invalidity satisfied 42 Whatcom County, Hirst (Eric
- Board's determination of invalidity satisfied 42 Whatcom County, Hirst (Eric) v. W Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hr'gs Bd., No. 91475-3 the statutory requirements and was based on due consideration of the facts
- The county initiated a rezone of an individual property and argued that the rezone was site-specific, and the Court of Appeals articulated that \a site-specific rezone is a project permit approval under LUPA if it is authorized by a then-existing comprehensive plan.\
- Board's determination of invalidity satisfied 42 Whatcom County, Hirst (Eric) v. W Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hr'gs Bd., No. 91475-3 the statutory requirements and was based on due consideration of the facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Timothy J. Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.