Skip to main content
· 5/23/2003

Jimenez v. Thompson Steel Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 264 F. Supp. 2d 693
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8771
  • 2003 WL 21221007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, absent knowledge of the details of the alleged harassment, the court was left with the possibility that the alleged conduct was extreme and outrageous
  • dismissing an IHRA claim for failure to allege receipt of a final order from the IHRC
  • “the fact that [the plaintiff] received a right to sue notice from the EEOC does not establish that he may bring suit under the IHRA”
  • “Under Illinois law, the comprehensive scheme of remedies and administrative procedures of the IHRA is the exclusive source of redress for alleged violations of the act.” (citing Mein v. Masonite Corp., 485 N.E.2d 312, 315 (Ill. 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bucklo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.