Jimenez v. Hon. chavez/state

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that preclusion of critical DNA evidence was a proper sanction because the State failed to disclose the evidence until the day before trial and the evidence was “indispensable” to the [S]tate’s case
• preclusion is a proper sanction only if “no less stringent sanctions will suffice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).