Jimenez-Pantaleon v. Aucancela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \[i]mposition of monetary damages that cannot later be recovered for reasons such as sovereign immunity constitutes irreparable injury\
• holding that a plaintiff seeking prospective injunctive relief against a public official in his official capacity must show the official has authority to perform the act
• noting that “state laws may be impliedly preempted either as a result of conflict or- field preemption”
• holding that plaintiffs could not challenge a particular statutory provision by suing the Oklahoma Attorney General under Ex parte Young “because the [plaintiffs] d[id] not cite to any Oklahoma law authorizing the Attorney General to enforce that provision”
• noting that “state laws may be impliedly preempted either as a result of conflict or field preemption”
• noting that “state laws may be impliedly preempted either as a result of conflict or field preemption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).