Jimenez, Noe v. Orlando Arauz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state statutory framework and the punitive nature of segregation created a liberty interest
• holding that moving a prisoner from general population to administrative segregation is a deprivation of liberty that must be accompanied by due process of law
• holding that an inmate had no liberty interest in avoiding transfer to a more restrictive facility
• holding that the word “shall” in an act of Congress indicates a course of conduct “of an unmistakably mandatory character”
• holding that prisoners have no protected liberty interest in being confined at a certain security level
• holding that due process requires that a hearing be held within a “reasonable” time after confinement to administrative segregation, and finding that five days “plainly satisfied” this requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).