Jimenez Colon, Luis Omar v. Colon Rivera, Alanna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an IIRIRA provision was imper- missibly retroactive because it “attached a new disability” to Vartelas’s pre-IIRIRA guilty plea and conviction
• holding that an IIRIRA provision was impermissibly retroactive because it “attached a new disability” to Vartelas’s pre-IIRIRA guilty plea and conviction
• holding that the collateral effects of a noncitizen’s conviction were determined “by the legal regime in force at the time of his conviction”
• holding that an IIRIRA provision was imper- missibly retroactive because it “attached a new disability” to Vartelas’s pre-IIRIRA guilty plea and conviction
• explaining that the Court has “several times recognized the severity of [the] sanction” of deportation
• explaining that Congress made “ad mission” the “key word” and removed the definition of “entry” from the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).