· 12/2/2013
Jimena v. Standish
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 696
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 561
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3329
- 571 U.S. 1078
- 2013 WL 5410691
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the doctrine “speaks to facts already within the defendant’s purview”
- finding impeachment evidence material under Brady where defendant was convicted based on the testimony of only one witness and the state presented no forensic or eyewitness testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.