Jim Sowell Const. Co., Inc. v. City of Coppell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing non-exhaustive guiding factors, including (1) the discriminatory effect of the official action, (2) the historical background of the decision, (3) the specific sequence of events leading up to the challenged decision, (4) departures from the normal procedure, (5
• “Evidence relevant to this factor is the City’s response to prior similar proposals, or whether the City has historically discriminated against the protected group.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).