Jim L. Napper and Wife, Jo Ann Napper v. Anderson, Henley, Shields, Bradford & Pritchard, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 18 U.S.C. § 1343 does not provide a private right of action for civil litigants
• holding that the Wire Fraud Act, codified in 18 U.S.C. § 1343, is a criminal statute that does not convey a private right of action
• holding that 18 U.S.C. § 1343 does not provide a private right of action for civil litigants
• holding that the mail fraud statute, like the wire fraud statute, cannot give rise to a civil action
• holding that 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (the Wire Fraud Act) does not create a federal cause of action for damages against defendants alleged to have violated its provisions
• holding federal wire fraud statute does not create a private cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).