Jim Hood v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, et a

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “CAFA does not change the traditional rule that the party seeking to remove the case to federal court bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction.”
• “Any ambiguities are construed against removal and in favor of remand to state court.”
• “Any ambiguities are construed against removal and in favor of remand to state court.”
• “Any ambiguities are construed against removal and in favor of remand to state court.”
• “Any ambiguities are construed against removal and in favor of remand to state court.”
• ‘Any ambiguities are construed against removal and in favor of remand to state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).