Skip to main content
· 11/16/1993

Jim ERICKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 9 F.3d 813
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8440
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 14434
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 29526
  • 1993 WL 469148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The ALJ must consider all factors that might have a significant 7 impact on an individual’s ability to work.”
  • “The ALJ must consider all factors that might have a ‘significant impact on an 2 individual's ability to work.’ ”
  • “The ALJ must consider all factors that might have a ‘significant impact on an individual’s ability to work.’” (citation omitted)
  • “The 6 ALJ must consider all factors that might have a significant impact on an 7 individual’s ability to work.”
  • “The relevant time period for assessing whether an error is plain is at the time of appellate consideration.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “[I]n reviewing an arbitral award for possible violations of public 10 policy . . . [a] court is not authorized to revisit or question the fact-finding or the reasoning which 11 produced the award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Nelson, Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.