· 11/16/1993
Jim ERICKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 9 F.3d 813
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8440
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 14434
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 29526
- 1993 WL 469148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The ALJ must consider all factors that might have a significant 7 impact on an individual’s ability to work.”
- “The ALJ must consider all factors that might have a ‘significant impact on an 2 individual's ability to work.’ ”
- “The ALJ must consider all factors that might have a ‘significant impact on an individual’s ability to work.’” (citation omitted)
- “The 6 ALJ must consider all factors that might have a significant impact on an 7 individual’s ability to work.”
- “The relevant time period for assessing whether an error is plain is at the time of appellate consideration.” (quotation marks omitted)
- “[I]n reviewing an arbitral award for possible violations of public 10 policy . . . [a] court is not authorized to revisit or question the fact-finding or the reasoning which 11 produced the award.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Nelson, Kaufman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.