· 8/9/1993
Jill Ruzicka v. The Conde Nast Publications, Inc., Claudia Dreifus
Citations
- 999 F.2d 1319
- 21 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1821
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20130
- 1993 WL 291393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The plaintiff need not be cited by name for the defamation to be ‘of and concerning the plaintiff.’ ” (Citation omitted.)
- “The plaintiff need not be cited by name for the defamation to be ‘of and concerning the plaintiff.’”
- discussing elements of promissory estoppel under Minnesota law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Lay, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.