Jill M. Crumpacker v. State of Kansas, Department of Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Hoyt is “the law of this circuit,” and that “the rule of Hoyt binds us”
• “[I]t is indisputable that federal appointment power is vested in the President. The Senate’s advice and consent power, exercised in the confirmation process, does not turn Presidential appointees into Senatorial appointees.”
• Kansas statute conditioned plaintiff’s employment on “the consent of the governor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).