Jill Hennessey v. The Gap, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We ‘cannot second-guess the jury’s credibility assessments’” when reviewing the sufficiency of evidence (quoting United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1170 (9th Cir. 2010))
• “In order to be controlling on the panel, a higher court’s decision must undercut the theory or reasoning underlying the prior circuit precedent in such a way that the cases are clearly irreconcilable.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).