Jilin Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. v. Chertoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the revocation of an approved petition at the Secretary’s discretion and affirming that “the District Court . . . lacked jurisdiction to review”
• noting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B) precluded review of constitutional questions involving revocation of visa petitions under 8 U.S.C. § 1155
• identifying four indications by separating “deems to be” from “good and sufficient cause”
• rejecting the appellants' argument ”[t]racking the Ninth Circuit’s logic in ANA International”
• revocation decision based on finding that the petitioner was not working in an executive or managerial capacity
• “Because evaluating these constitutional claims requires us to revisit and review the Attorney General’s exercise of discretion . . . we lack the jurisdiction to consider them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).