Jian Ping Zheng v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relator lacked standing to assert claims for unjust enrichment, fraud, and mistake of fact on behalf of the government
• finding that in a 12(c) motion challenging subject-matter jurisdiction, a court may consider “materials outside the pleadings, such as affidavits, documents and testimony,” because a court may properly consider those materials in a Rule 12(b)(1) challenge
• “the FCA ‘does not give relators the right to assert common law claims on behalf of the United States.’”
• “I]t is not appropriate to grant [the plaintiffs] request [for leave to m| amend the Complaint] because the Court has determined that it does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).