Ji Cheng Ni v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Board’s ongoing refusal to respond meaningfully to [CECC reports] is difficult to understand.”
• “[A litigant] is entitled to have the expert agency ... evaluate in a transparent way the evidence that he has presented. Simply stating that a [particular] document defeats a claim ... will not do.”
• “In closing, we note that we make no prediction on the ultimate outcome of Ni’s motion to reopen or his application for asylum. But he is entitled to have the expert agency, the BIA, evaluate in a transparent way the evidence that he has presented.”
• “In closing, we note that we make no prediction on the ultimate outcome of Ni’s motion to reopen or his application for asylum. But he is entitled to have the expert agency, the BIA, evaluate in a transparent way the evidence that he has presented.”
• “In closing, we note that we make no prediction on the ultimate outcome of Ni’s motion to reopen or his application for asylum. But he is entitled to have the expert agency, the BIA, evaluate in a transparent way the evidence that he has presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).