Jhordan C. v. MARY K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when no doctor was involved in sperm donation or in artificial insemination, sperm was never “provided to a licensed physician” so donor fell outside statutory nonpaternity provisions
• finding that where the statute specifies that the semen be provided to a licensed physician, if the artificial insemination occurred outside of the guidance of a physician, the statute does not apply
• court analyzes applicability of artificial insemination statute despite parties' ignorance of it
• physician involvement essential to obtain donor’s complete medical history which child may later need and creates a formal structure for donation which reduces misunderstandings of the relationship between donor and recipient and donor, recipient and child
• physician involvement essential to obtain donor's complete medical history which child may later need and creates a formal structure for donation which reduces misunderstandings of the relationship between donor and recipient and donor, recipient and child
• court analyzes applicability of artificial insemination statute despite parties’ ignorance of it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).