Jhonson Barthelemy, AKA Johnson Barthelemy v. John D. Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that alien “does not enjoy derivative citizenship under the first clause of § 321(a)(3) because his natural parents never married and thus could not legally separate”
• holding that a petitioner did not “enjoy derivative citizenship under the first clause of § 321(a)(3) because his natural par- ents never married and thus could not legally separate.” (emphasis in original)
• concluding subsection (3)’s first clause could not apply to a petitioner whose “natural parents never married and thus could not legally separate” (emphasis removed)
• concluding subsection (3)’s first clause could not apply to a petitioner whose “natural parents never married and thus could not legally separate” (emphasis removed)
• applying Fiallo to a facial equal protection challenge based on “former marital status”
• applying Fiallo to a facial equal protection challenge based on “former marital status”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).