J.H. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction under section 810.097(1) for trespassing without legitimate business for being on campus and rejecting contention that school principal should have inquired with juvenile why he was on campus because “[s]ection 810.097(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• S.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-12· cited 4×
• C.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-10· cited 1×
• X.B., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-11-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• C.E.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-05· cited 32×
• A.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-14· cited 14×
• State v. E.N.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 10×
• A.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-05· cited 6×
• M.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-04· cited 4×