Jewell v. Dyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that mere speculation that allegedly erroneous ruling made difference in ultimate result does not satisfy appellant’s burden to demonstrate prejudice warranting reversal
• providing that hearing on Rule 59 motion “not mandatory, particularly where, as here, the moving party has failed to show prejudice flowing from the lack of a hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).