Skip to main content
· 8/8/1988

Jewelers Vigilance Committee, Inc. v. Ullenberg Corp.

Citations

  • 853 F.2d 888
  • 7 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1628
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10735
  • 1988 WL 81468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “proof of intent to trade on another’s goodwill” can provide “persuasive evidence of likelihood of confusion”
  • “proof of intent to trade on another’s goodwill” can provide “persuasive evidence of likelihood of confusion”
  • “Moreover, proof of intent to trade on another's goodwill, while persuasive evidence of likelihood of confusion, is not, in any event, a requirement under section 2(d).”
  • “Moreover, proof of intent to trade on another's goodwill, while persuasive evidence of likelihood of confusion, is not, in any event, a requirement under section 2(d).”
  • “Moreover, proof of intent to trade on another's goodwill, while persuasive evidence of likelihood of confusion, is not, in any event, a requirement under section 2(d).”
  • “Moreover, proof of intent to trade on another’s goodwill, while persuasive evidence of likelihood of confusion, is not, in any event, a requirement under section 2(d).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Nies, Bissell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.