Jewelers Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 1995 amendment to RCW 46.61.5055 prospective only, and deciding double jeopardy challenge to preamendment version of statute
• holding 1995 amendment to RCW 46.61.5055 prospective only, and deciding double jeopardy challenge to pre-amendment version of statute
• legislature’s use of future and present tenses in an amendment strengthens a presumption that it is prospective only
• legislature's use of future and present tenses in an amendment strengthens a presumption that it is prospective only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).