Skip to main content
· 8/6/2001

Jewel A. Farlow,plaintiff-Appellant v. Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A.

Citations

  • 259 F.3d 309
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17612
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,673
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 793
  • 2001 WL 880091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that financial relationship and intent of parties outweighed plaintiffs on-site work and hiring company’s control of hours at the office in determining that hiring company was not an employer under Title VII
  • noting that although the district court has the right to decide pendent claims, ““‘[c]ertainly, if the federal claims are dismissed before trial, even though not insubstantial in a jurisdictional sense, the state claims should be dismissed as well’”
  • finding the fact that the plaintiff did not receive paid vacation weighed in favor of independent contractor status
  • stating that lack of benefits indicates independent contractor status
  • discussing district court’s discretion to dis miss pendant state-law claims without prejudice after resolving all federal claims in defendant’s favor
  • stating that lack of benefits indicates independent contractor status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Luttig, Smith, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.