Jeun v. Iowa Department of Job Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Batson Court identified the “test for determining when an agency decision is entitled to preclusive effect”
• holding ALJ’s decision to preclude consideration of complainant’s chai lenge to agency’s findings infringed upon complainant’s right to due process
• under certain circumstances, at an adminis trative hearing, an applicant denied family day care registration has a due process right to challenge an agency’s underlying findings of “abuse indicated”
• whether agency's declarations should be given collateral estoppel effect depends upon whether agency was acting in judicial capacity, issue presented to court was actually litigated before the agency, and resolution of issue was necessary to the agency’s decision
• unsuccessfully arguing that DSS’s determination of child abuse precludes a potential day care licensee from challenging the merits of the finding in a subsequent licensing proceeding even though she was never afforded any forum to challenge DSS’s decision
• unsuccessfully arguing that DSS's determination of child abuse precludes a potential day care licensee from challenging the merits of the finding in a subsequent licensing proceeding even though she was never afforded any forum to challenge DSS's decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).