Jett v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming exclusion of safety rules was error, the error did not substantially affect the verdict because “ample evidence in the record made the same point”
• evidentiary error was harmless under ORS 19.415(2) and OEC 103(1) because “ample evidence in the record made the same point that” the appellant sought to make by introducing the excluded evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).