Jetcraft Corp. v. FlightSafety International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the Kansas Supreme Court has consistently required, as a prerequisite to the use of collateral estoppel, that the parties of the subsequent litigation be identical to or in privity with parties in the earlier action.”
• \The suggestion in Goetz that collateral estoppel does not require mutuality of parties has found no further support in the rulings of Kansas courts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).