Jesus Hernandez v. Maria Rosenda Rodriguez (Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court: DR-23-900041).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a single witness is sufficient to uphold a conviction, even when the witness’ account is disputed by the defendant
• concluding that instructions that comport with Winship and state law were not consti- tutionally erroneous
• concluding that instructions that comport with Winship and state law were not constitutionally erroneous
• concluding that instructions that comport with Winship and state law were not constitutionally erroneous
• denying habeas relief on sufficiency of the evidence claim under AEDPA standard of 28 review because a rational jury could make the finding at issue
• denying habeas relief on sufficiency of the evidence claim under AEDPA standard of 28 review because a rational jury could make the finding at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).