Skip to main content
· 2/4/1998

Jessica Ryan v. Grae & Rybicki, P.C.

Citations

  • 135 F.3d 867
  • 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1387
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1863
  • 1998 WL 50127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff failed to show that she was substantially limited in her ability to control elimination of waste
  • holding that, assuming ability to control waste was major life activity, plaintiff failed to show that her colitis substantially limited this activity
  • holding that a plaintiff failed to show that she was substantially limited in her ability to control elimination of waste
  • holding that to state a claim for discriminatory discharge under the ADA, the plaintiff must allege, among other things, that he suffers from a disability, as that term is defined in the ADA
  • holding that statement to plaintiff that “this job is too stressful for you because you have colitis” did not, in light of employer’s having given her strong employment recommendations, support conclusion that employer misperceived her as being disabled
  • finding that an impairment that became asymptomatic for long periods of time counseled against finding substantial limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, McLaughlin, Godbold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.