Skip to main content
· 8/25/2003

Jessen v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 877
  • 111 Cal. App. 4th 698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that the California Supreme Court has decided that “a ‘substantial relationship’ exists whenever the ‘subjects’ of the prior and the current representations are linked in some rational manner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dibiaso

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.