· 8/25/2003
Jessen v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 877
- 111 Cal. App. 4th 698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that the California Supreme Court has decided that “a ‘substantial relationship’ exists whenever the ‘subjects’ of the prior and the current representations are linked in some rational manner”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dibiaso
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.