Skip to main content
· 6/21/2011

Jessen v. Cigna Group Insurance

Citations

  • 812 F. Supp. 2d 805
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66274
  • 2011 WL 2516157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “only those facts in possession of the administrator at the time of the determination should be considered by a court”
  • relying, in part, on the opinion of the treating physician to support its conclusion that plaintiffs proposed benefits determination was sound

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.