Jesse W. Tolefree v. Harry Ritz, Badge No. 19, City of Richmond Police Department, First Doe, Second Doe, Third Doe, Seventh Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the case “was also properly dismissed as to the fictitious defendants,” and “[i]f plaintiff later ascertains the names of additional persons he wishes join as defendants, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide a way of doing so’’
• “[This case] was also properly 24 dismissed as to the fictitious defendants[.] If plaintiff later ascertains the names of additional 25 persons he wishes to join as defendants, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide a way of 26 doing so.”
• “[This case] was also properly 21 dismissed as to the fictitious defendants. . . . If plaintiff later ascertains the names of additional 22 persons he wishes to join as defendants, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide a way of 23 doing so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).