Skip to main content
· 4/16/2004

Jesse M. Bowers v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

Citations

  • 365 F.3d 535
  • 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2134
  • 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 604
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7324
  • 2004 WL 813577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that ERISA plan administrators may not be able to challenge their own eligibility determinations
  • finding that a remand to the plan administrator “permit[ted] either party to challenge the eligibility determination that the plan administrator renders on remand”
  • adopting this rule and noting that it “allow[s] either party to challenge the [plan administrator’s] ensuing eligibility determination [on remand] by motion before the same [district] court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norris, Cole, Economus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.