Jesse L. Anthony v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing 12(b)(6) dismissal on statute-of-limitations grounds because Defendants failed to conclusively establish that Plaintiffs should have discovered their injury through a diligent inquiry
• affirming the district court’s denial of leave to amend after a 12(b)(6) dismissal
• “These allegations do not restart the statute of limitations because they did not describe a specific act or word contributing to the conspiracy.”
• “Defendants bear the burden of proof on the statute of limitations defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).