· 6/20/2001
Jesse J. Calhoun v. Donald N. Stahl James Brazelton
Citations
- 254 F.3d 845
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 6269
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5086
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13738
- 2001 WL 687024
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners
- holding that the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners
- holding that the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners
- holding that the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners
- holding that the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners
- holding that 18 district courts must screen all IFP plaintiffs’ complaints, not just prisoners’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Silverman, Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.