· 12/5/1997
Jess v. Carey (In Re Jess)
Citations
- 215 B.R. 618
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 75
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 110
- 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2064
- 1997 WL 790468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the fact that postpetition services are nec essarily performed does not cause the right to payment for prepetition services to be excluded from the estate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hagan, Ryan, Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.