Skip to main content
· 12/5/1997

Jess v. Carey (In Re Jess)

Citations

  • 215 B.R. 618
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 75
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 110
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2064
  • 1997 WL 790468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the fact that postpetition services are nec essarily performed does not cause the right to payment for prepetition services to be excluded from the estate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagan, Ryan, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.