Jess F. Rhodes v. Amarillo Hospital District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing motion for leave to amend under Rule 15 standard and affirming district court’s denial of motion
• upholding denial of a motion filed 30 months after the initial complaint and 3 weeks before trial
• upholding denial of a motion filed 30 months after the initial complaint and 3 weeks before trial
• finding even under a presumption in favor of granting untimely jury demands that “[i]t is not an abuse of discretion by a District Judge to deny a Rule 39(b
• affirming the denial of the plaintiff's motion to amend without any reasoning from the district court, because the fact that the plaintiff filed its amendment thirty months after the original complaint was an \obvious ground\ to deny the plaintiff's motion to amend
• “This is not a case in which incomplete or inadequate pleadings, uncorrected by amendment, doomed plaintiff’s recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).