Jerskey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopts the standard of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), that an error may be considered harmless only if it can be shown beyond a reasonable doubt that it was harmless and did not contribute to the conviction
• adopts the standard of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), that an error may be considered harmless only if it can be shown beyond a reasonable doubt that it was harmless and did not contribute to the conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).