Jerry L. Vinyard v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]neffective-assistance claims need not be presented on direct appeal to preserve them for collateral attack under § 2255 . . . .”
• “issues raised on direct appeal may not be reconsidered on a § 2255 motion absent changed circumstances”
• discussing the standard stated in Flores-Ortega

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).