Jerry L. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BLACK & DECKER, INCORPORATED, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow defendant to depose a witness since discovery had been closed for a month and defendant had failed to diligently obtain the deposition in a timely fashion
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow defendant to depose a witness since discovery had been closed for a month and defendant had failed to diligently obtain the deposition in a timely fashion
• af- firming admission of subsequent remedial measures where defendant disputed feasibility
• af- firming admission of subsequent remedial measures where defendant disputed feasibility
• af- firming admission of subsequent remedial measures where defendant disputed feasibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).