Jerry L. Bangmon v. Latonia Jones and Rodney Simon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding ALJ's determination that the claimant's “course of treatment has been conservative,” as “medications effectively alleviated her pain symptoms, and the record lacked evidence that she had sought more aggressive treatment”
• upholding ALJ’s determination that the claimant’s “course of treatment has been conservative,” as “medications effectively alleviated her pain symptoms, and the record lacked evidence that she had sought more aggressive treatment”
• “Our review, in short, is for substantial evidence—we reverse the ALJ’s decision only if the record compels a contrary result.”
• “The VE’s testimony need only ‘instill some confidence that the estimate was not conjured out of whole cloth.’” (quoting Brace, 970 F.3d at 822)
• “[W]hen objective medical evidence conflicts with a claimant’s description of the intensity or persistence of pain, an ALJ must consider all evidence in the record—such as…course of treatment[.]”
• “A federal court’s review of an ALJ's decision ‘is case-by-case,’ and ‘takes into account all features of the vocational expert’s testimony, as well as the rest of the administrative record.’” (quoting Biestek, 139 S. Ct. at 1157)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).