Skip to main content
· 8/25/2003

Jerrilyn Hunley Jerome Hunley v. Dupont Automotive, Division of E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 341 F.3d 491
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17645
  • 2003 WL 21998432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a plaintiff must point to evidence of record in affidavits, depositions, or written discovery in creating a triable issue of fact that would defeat summary judgment
  • “A district court may properly grant summary judgment on grounds not argued in the motion by the parties.”
  • ―[The plaintiff security guard] cannot [] recoup damages for harm that was allegedly caused by performing the basic duty that he was hired to perform: encountering a stressful situation relating to the [defendant‘s] security.‖
  • “[The plaintiff security guard] cannot [] recoup damages for harm that was allegedly caused by performing the basic duty that he was hired to perform: encountering a stressful situation relating to the [defendant‟s] security.”
  • “[The plaintiff security guard] cannot [] recoup damages for harm that was allegedly caused by performing the basic duty that he was hired to perform: encountering a stressful situation relating to the [defendant‟s] security.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Gilman, Marbley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.