Jerome v. Pardis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding responses to discovery that attempt to mislead by concealing information which is material to the other party's case are not consistent with the rules and the \spirit of discovery\
• holding responses to discovery that attempt to mislead by concealing information which is material to the other party's case are not consistent with the rules and the \spirit of discovery\
• although trial court erred in imposing sanction under Rule 37(b) in the absence of a prior discovery order, sanction would be affirmed under Rule 26(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).