Jerome Powell v. John Lambert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[m]any aspects 5 of Washington’s rule concerning time bars for personal restraint petitions are clear, consistently 6 applied, and well-established,” and the procedural bar for untimely mixed petitions was 7 consistently applied after the law was settled in 2000
• rejecting argument that court should not consider unpublished decisions in a procedural default analysis
• “A petitioner has exhausted his federal claims when he has fully and fairly presented them to the state courts.”
• “A petitioner has exhausted his federal claims when he has fully and fairly presented them to the state courts.”
• “In presenting his claims to 9 the state court, a petitioner must comply with state procedural rules.”
• “In presenting his claims to the 3 | state court, a petitioner must comply with state procedural rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).