Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding anticompetitive conduct allegedly “employed in an unlawful quest for 14 market dominance [was] precisely the sort that the antitrust laws were intended to remedy”
• referring to a Rule 15(d) motion to add “post- 4 complaint allegations” as seeking “amendment” of the complaint
• as competitors of the defendant, the LaSalvias are the proper parties to challenge the defendants' anticompetitive conduct in an action for attempted monopolization
• “Motions to amend pursuant 13 to Rule 15(d) should be granted unless undue prejudice to the opposing party will result.” 14 (cleaned up)
• as competitors of the defendant, the LaSalvias are the proper parties to challenge the defendants’ anti-competitive conduct in an action for attempted monopolization
• “The purpose of Rule 15(d) 23 is to promote as complete an adjudication of the dispute between the parties as is 24 possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).