· 4/29/1966
Jerome H. Moore and Mildred v. Moore v. United States of America, Jerome H. Moore and Mildred v. Moore v. United States
Citations
- 360 F.2d 353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]hile the criminal evasion statute does not explicitly require a finding of fraud, the case-by-ease process of construction of the civil [fraud] and criminal tax provisions has demonstrated that their constituent elements are identical.”
- “[W]hile the criminal evasion statute does not explicitly require a finding of fraud, the case-by-case pro- cess of construction of the civil [fraud] and criminal tax provisions has demonstrated that their constituent ele- ments are identical.”
- “[W]hile the criminal evasion statute does not explicitly require a finding of fraud, the case-by-case process of construction of the civil [fraud] and criminal tax provisions has demonstrated that their constituent elements are identical.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haynsworth, Sobeloff, Boreman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.