Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discovery sanctions are non- 18 dispositive pretrial matters that are reviewed for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 72(a)
• holding that 25 under the clearly erroneous standard, “[t]he reviewing court may not simply substitute its 26 judgment for that of the deciding court.” (citing United States v. BNS, Inc., 858 F.2d 456, 464 (9th 27 Cir. 1988))
• noting that Section 636 “requires a magistrate [judge] to refer contempt charges to a district 26 court judge.”
• noting that § 636 “requires a magistrate judge to refer contempt charges to a 4 district court judge.”
• noting that § 636 “requires a magistrate judge to refer contempt charges to a 3 district court judge.”
• noting that Section 636 “requires a magistrate [judge] to refer contempt 2 charges to a district court judge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).