JEROME ERIC BIVENS W v. GREGORY TONY, SHERIFF and STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “substantial evidence” in the administrative review context means “more than a mere scintilla” and “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
• explaining that substantial evidence “means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
• stating that if the evidence supports more 3 than one interpretation, the court must defer to the Commissioner’s interpretation
• defining substantial evidence as \such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion\
• “Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
• more than a mere scintilla; relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept to support conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).