Jerome Dickey v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that equitable tolling under Illinois law may be appropriate where defendant actively misled plaintiff or prevented plaintiff from asserting rights in an “extraordinary way”
• concluding Edge Act 17 jurisdiction exists even under narrow interpretation where plaintiff “alleged foreign 18 banking transactions involving [Chase] as a core part of their claims of wrongdoing”
• “[T]he district was correct to apply New York choice-of-law principles.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).